🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. As time has passed, an event that began as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has taken on a corporate feel, growing to encompass events where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to talk to predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and active solidarity. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The Background of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in February, but also in autumn in the Britain, Germany, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has developed since that time, focusing less on the accounts of transatlantic enslavement and fights for racial justice, and greater focus on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the observance is celebrated is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a good lesson in how appropriation leads to erosion: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Troubling Time

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the summer we observed the largest far-right rally in British history. the Conservative leader, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a elected representative feels emboldened to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. Meanwhile, far-right parties are growing in Europe as a whole.

In the United States, a colossal assault against DEI and affirmative action has been taken, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the state. A campaign to scrub the history of people of color and narrative from the archives is in progress. One of the former president's initial presidential directives targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to change the national past” by depicting the United States “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the observance illustrates how insufficiently it can be effective if it is limited to either obligatory business commemorations, or politically neutered festivities of historical achievements, rather than confronting the realities of the present. It also shows how its short period means that it is separated from the broader ongoing work that is necessary. A university professor, a professor at a learning establishment, put it best when she raised concerns about the temporary “tokenism” of the celebration. “The difficulty with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month turns into a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend initiatives for racial equality and recognition in such moments of dejection and worry is a treacherous thing. There is a inclination to just eliminate events including Black History Month completely, believing they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an period that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and heritage of campaigns for equality – local anti-racism groups, DEI programs, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an infrastructure that a considerable labor has gone into. It is there not just to decay as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month appear as? Firstly, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed through the year (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into educational programs. It would also be a time that does not evade governmental matters, and leaves space for individuals, particularly youth, to express their concerns and stories. What purpose serves basic knowledge of the past when it ignores the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Institutions who mark it should not be pacified with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and awareness of “microaggressions”, but faced with the dangers that affect everyone if anti-racism is not taken seriously. To summarize, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and reactive. Maybe an complete renaming is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.